Finance curricula cannot be going through changes by the day. But with AI models developing in speed, there evolves that important question to focus on skills that people will sport five years down the road. According to Hema Thakur, an experienced educator in finance and skill development, building finance professionals consists of learning very basic concepts of adjustments and tech empathy instead of learning just tool knowledge.
An AI model can go through different iterations of explanation depending upon its sophistication: is it super- or unsupervised, neural networks or decision tree, and the like. Once students have been exposed to these categorizations, then no model should ever look strange in the future because students could freely explore new tools rather than be confused by them.
They shall interpret only when it feels confident or uncertain. Such blanket acceptance of AI output is as dangerous as ignoring it. Awareness of confidence intervals may then help the students apply their judgment to weigh if that variability level is apt to accept or should be met with risk accommodation, accordingly.
Equally important is the ability to ask the right questions. AI tools are only as good as the prompts they are given. Teaching students to prompt, “What factors should I consider before investing ₹1 lakh in a medium-risk mutual fund?” instead of issuing a yes/no prompt like, “Should I invest ₹1 lakh in this fund?” will lead to answers that provide good actionable insights.
AI spots a pattern, and only sometimes the ploys are misleading ones. In this big-data era, correlation without causation is hardly difficult to establish. Finance students ought to be able to discern a true pattern and evaluate it against relevant Indian indicators like UPI usage, SMS metadata, electricity billing trends, or regional consumption patterns.
Finance is not independent anymore. Now we have it straying into psychology, sociology, and technology. The new-age finance curriculum should design topics on “Why do people make poor financial decisions?” so that students learn both behavioral bias and economic theory. According to Hema Thakur, this becomes the next big milestone in complete financial literacy.
AI sometimes does not specify an answer; finance, however, needs one. Students have to be comfortable with variables such as ‘temperature’ in an AI model to understand when consistency really counts, e.g., for loan approvals, and when you might be able to get away with a bit of randomness as a measure of user behavior.
Although students might not always have to code, they should be able to converse with their tech team, So to speak:
Defining the Problem: Predicting which MSME loan applicants will default within 12 months.
Key Variables: Payment History, Cashflow, Region, Business Age.
Data Requirements: Bank statements, Credit scores, GST filings.
Output: Risk score categorized as ‘low,’ ‘medium,’ and ‘high.’
Constraint: Explainable; no black-box models.
Having clear problem statements such as these would make for less confusion and greater collaboration.
An AI model can also provide lost in knowledge on global analogues—for example, linking Indian microfinance defaults with African mobile money systems. The usefulness aside, students must localize those inquiries: Does the data hold in Indian law’s context? Will it ever get the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) clearance? Are the intended users digitally literate?
Another skill to hone is realizing how AI-generated profiles—such as “risk-averse investor”—are too simplistic. A 60-year-old woman could be in the process of starting a business or planning for retirement. AI outputs should serve as motivation for further investigation, not as a concluded decision. Asking AI, “What assumptions are you making?” could assist in shedding light on blind spots.
Students need to understand the value of transferable skills. This is the knowledge that transcends change in tools: for example, LIBOR is now on its deathbed, but designing a financial benchmark is still standing tall. “What remains important even as tools change?” might be a question that will calm their nerves and keep their skills relevant.
And critical thinking will include digital literacy too. Students must learn to check their sources, flag obsolete reports, and sift through unreliable information coming from AI tools. Disinformation can just as easily bring down a financial analysis’ foundations as an actual mathematical error.
Being up-to-date means discipline. They will learn to question the timeline of the data, whether the update has taken into account the new law or the input has changed. It is one of the ways to free themselves from irrelevant information rather than drowning in it.
In spite of all the fuss about AI, the basics still count in finance. Students require a deeper grasp of core concepts and generating a set of meaningful questions. The prompt “Suggest low-risk ESG investments” will work only if the student really understands what ESG criteria are and how to measure risk for them. One major error we all commit is not understanding the meaning behind the key terms just because of the AI’s working onboard default logic.
With the existing foundation models, CAPM or Black-Scholes may be altered, yet they are still relevant. They help finance professionals in justifying or rejecting practically all AI outputs. It would not be wise to bash them for the sake of black-box tools.
In the end, finance education is not going to be about learning all that technology tripping up at a fast pace. This will be an opportunity for students to learn how to think critically, adapt ethically, and work in tandem with AI without depending on direct use of AI. According to Hema Thakur:
“The tools will change. But clarity, empathy, and ethical judgment will always be in demand.”
Finance graduates for the next generation must be proficient in spreadsheets and algorithms while grounded in human values but flexible enough to traverse through technical advancement. That is a vision worth pursuing for future finance education.
Disclaimer: This article is from the Brand Desk. User discretion is advised.
