Trump, Putin Conclude Alaska Talks Without Agreement On Ending Ukraine War


US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin wrapped up a highly anticipated meeting in Alaska on Friday without reaching a concrete agreement to end the war in Ukraine. Despite expressing optimism, both leaders offered few details, leaving the international community uncertain about the future of Europe’s largest land conflict since World War II.

Constructive Talks but No Deal

After more than two and a half hours of private discussions at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska’s largest military installation, the leaders appeared before the media to share brief statements. Putin spoke first, highlighting the tone of the meeting.

“The negotiations took place in a constructive and mutually respectful atmosphere,” Putin said. “They were very thorough and useful. We hope that the understanding we have reached will pave the way for peace in Ukraine.” He also urged Kyiv and European capitals to approach the talks constructively, warning against actions that could disrupt progress.

Putin further cautioned against provocations or behind-the-scenes intrigues that could derail negotiations. “For Russia, the events in Ukraine are associated with fundamental threats to our national security,” he said. “A fair balance in the security sphere in Europe and the world as a whole must be restored.”

Trump Acknowledges Progress, But Stresses Work Remains

Trump, speaking after Putin, confirmed that discussions had covered multiple points of agreement but emphasized that no deal had been finalized.

“There’s no deal until there’s a deal,” Trump said. “We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to. Some are minor, one is very significant — and we have a very good chance of getting there. But we didn’t get there.”

Trump said he plans to brief Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders on the summit, underscoring that international consultation would be necessary before any formal agreement could be reached.

The location of the summit carried significant symbolism. The meeting took place at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, a Cold War-era base historically used to monitor the Soviet Union. Both leaders arrived in their respective presidential jets, with Trump applauding as Putin stepped on US soil for the first time since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

The choice of Alaska also evoked historical resonance. The United States purchased Alaska from Russia in 1867, a transaction Moscow has occasionally referenced in discussions about territorial legitimacy. The setting underscored the complex historical backdrop behind contemporary US-Russia relations.

Past Tensions

Trump has long voiced admiration for Putin, but his relationship with the Russian leader has drawn intense scrutiny. Critics pointed to the 2018 summit, where Trump appeared to accept Putin’s denials of Russian interference in the 2016 US election. Earlier this year, in a February 28 White House meeting, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, demanding concessions and promising to bring peace within 24 hours.

Despite repeated outreach and warnings of “very severe consequences” if Moscow did not accept a ceasefire, Putin has shown little willingness to compromise. Nonetheless, the Alaska talks suggested both leaders remain open to continued dialogue. As the summit concluded, Putin smiled and remarked in English, “Next time in Moscow,” hinting at a potential follow-up meeting.

The Unresolved Conflict

The summit ended without a ceasefire or formal peace agreement. While both leaders highlighted areas of progress, the reality on the ground remains unchanged. The war in Ukraine, which has lasted more than three years, continues to devastate communities, strain global alliances, and test diplomatic efforts.

For Trump, the Alaska meeting represented another attempt to assert influence over a conflict that has dominated international headlines. For Putin, it was an opportunity to reinforce Russia’s negotiating position while signaling a willingness to engage with the West on broader security concerns.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *