The high-profile sexual assault trial involving five former Team Canada junior hockey players—Michael McLeod, Dillon Dubé, Alex Formenton, Cal Foote, and Carter Hart—has captivated the nation with graphic testimony, legal twists, and a courtroom drama that has stretched over several intense weeks. With closing arguments underway, the spotlight now turns to Justice Maria Carroccia, who will soon decide the fate of the accused.
From mistrial to courtroom reset: Early disruption defined the case
The trial’s chaotic start included a mistrial triggered by an interaction between a defense lawyer and a juror, prompting the formation of a second jury. Technical glitches, courtroom tension, and logistical issues plagued the early weeks—yet none more jarring than the testimony from the complainant, known only as E.M.
Graphic testimony shocks courtroom and draws public support
E.M.’s emotionally charged, nine-day testimony laid out her version of the night in June 2018, detailing her encounter with the accused players following a Hockey Canada gala. She claimed she was sexually assaulted by multiple men, describing being spat on, slapped, and humiliated. Her allegations were met with fierce cross-examination by the defense, who suggested she sought a “wild night” and later regretted her actions.
Defense cross-examinations aim to create doubt
Defense lawyers attempted to discredit E.M.’s story, focusing on inconsistencies, alcohol consumption, and her behavior that night. “He didn’t come dressed for court. He is inarticulate, a poor communicator, careless with words,” said Carter Hart’s lawyer, Megan Savard, while describing witness Brett Howden during a heated exchange.Carter Hart was the only defendant to take the stand. He stated, “E.M. was soliciting sex from the men,” and claimed the acts were consensual. His testimony included acknowledgment of the controversial “consent videos,” one of which featured him contacting another player to join the room, despite claiming discomfort.With the jury dismissed mid-trial due to concerns over lawyer conduct, Justice Carroccia will rule alone. Closing arguments began June 9, and while no verdict timeline has been provided, the decision could reverberate across Hockey Canada and the broader sports world.Also Read: Legal experts warn Hockey Canada sex assault trial could trigger rushed consent law changes that damage Canada’s justice systemThe case has reignited conversations around consent, accountability, and institutional response to sexual violence in professional sports.
